Health Literacy Questionnaire Scales Research Articles

Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore.

Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students. To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students. This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years. In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales. This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.

Health literacy among fathers and fathers-to-be: a multi-country, cross-sectional survey.

During pregnancy and early fatherhood, men are at higher risk of poor health, exacerbated by low engagement by healthcare services. Yet the transition to fatherhood presents an opportunity for men to improve their health and health behaviours. Health literacy refers to individuals' competence in accessing and applying health information. Poor health literacy is associated with poor health and low help-seeking. The aim of this study was to identify health literacy strengths, needs and profiles among fathers. Men who were expecting a baby ('antenatal') or had become fathers in the past 18 months ('postnatal') were recruited through an international, online paid survey platform. The survey included the nine-scale Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Of 889 survey respondents (n = 416, 46.5% antenatal; n = 473, 53.5% postnatal), 274 (31.0%) were residing in the USA and 239 (27.0%) in the UK. Relatively higher scores were reported for HLQ scales relating to having sufficient information and finding and understanding this information, as well as social support for health. Relatively lower scores were obtained for scales relating to actively managing one's own health and navigating the health care system. Three scale scores were significantly lower among nulliparous than multiparous men. Seven health literacy profiles were identified. In conclusion, while fathers have some health literacy strengths, they also experience some barriers, particularly first-time fathers. Awareness of diverse health literacy profiles among fathers may assist in developing strategies to strengthen health services' capacity to meet fathers' needs and reduce risks to their health at this critical juncture in families' lives.

Health literacy strengths and challenges of people in New South Wales prisons: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)

BackgroundHealth literacy is an important factor for enabling people to manage their health and live long fulfilling lives. People in prison are frequently from marginalised communities, often out of reach of conventional community based health organisations, and have poorer health outcomes. It is essential to understanding the health literacy profiles of people in prison, and its contribution to the well-established health inequities and outcomes of this population. This study aimed to use a multi-dimensional health literacy measurement tool to describe the strengths and challenges of adults incarcerated in NSW prisons.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted for people in prison across 14 publicly operated metropolitan prisons. Data were collected from 471 participants using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Participant characteristics and health conditions were also collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Effect sizes (ES) for standardised differences in means were used to describe the magnitude of difference between participant characteristic groups.ResultsParticipants’ median age was 38.0 (range 19 – 91) years. Males comprised 81% of the sample, 21% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, and 53% reported a health problem. People in prison had lower scores for all nine HLQ scales when compared to the general Australian population. Small to medium ES were seen for mean differences between most demographic groups. Compared to males, females had lower scores for several of the HLQ scales including ‘having sufficient information to manage health’ (ES 0.30 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.07, 0.53]), ‘ability to actively engage with health care professionals’ (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), ‘navigating the healthcare system’ (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), and, ‘ability to find good health information’ (ES 0.33 [95% CI 0.10, 0.57]). Differing health literacy scale scores with small to medium ES were found when comparing participants by legal status. Mainly small ES were seen when comparing other participant characteristic groups.ConclusionsThis study provides insights into the health literacy strengths and challenges for people in NSW prisons. These findings highlight the important role health literacy could have in addressing health disparities in this vulnerable population and can inform prison health services.

Health literacy strengths and challenges among residents of a resource-poor village in rural India: Epidemiological and cluster analyses.

Cluster analysis can complement and extend the information learned through epidemiological analysis. The aim of this study was to determine the relative merits of these two data analysis methods for describing the multidimensional health literacy strengths and challenges in a resource poor rural community in northern India. A cross-sectional survey (N = 510) using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) was undertaken. Descriptive epidemiology included mean scores and effect sizes among sociodemographic characteristics. Cluster analysis was based on the nine HLQ scales to determine different health literacy profiles within the population. Participants reported highest mean scores for Scale 4. Social support for health (2.88) and Scale 6. Ability to actively engage with healthcare professionals (3.66). Lower scores were reported for Scale 3. Actively managing my health (1.81) and Scale 8. Ability to find good health information (2.65). Younger people (<35 years) had much higher scores than older people (ES >1.0) for social support. Eight clusters were identified. In Cluster A, educated younger men (mean age 27 years) reported higher scores on all scales except one (Scale 1. Feeling understood and supported by a healthcare professional) and were the cluster with the highest number (43%) of new hypertension diagnoses. In contrast, Cluster H also had young participants (mean age 30 years) but with low education (72% illiterate) who scored lowest across all nine scales. While epidemiological analysis provided overall health literacy scores and associations between health literacy and other characteristics, cluster analysis provided nuanced health literacy profiles with the potential to inform development of solutions tailored to the needs of specific population subgroups.

Health literacy status of pregnant women and women with young children in Tasmania.

The literature provides evidence that maternal health is strongly linked with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and their associated risk factors. Enabling women with the asset of health literacy may help to reduce the intergenerational impact of NCDs. However, little is known about the health literacy of pregnant women and women with young children in Tasmania and globally. This study aimed to identify the health literacy status of pregnant women and women with young children (0-8 years) living in Tasmania and describe their health literacy status according to their demographic characteristics. An online cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The survey included demographic questions and a health literacy questionnaire (HLQ). The description of demographic differences across the HLQ scales focused on effect sizes (ES) for standardised differences in mean health literacy scores. The differences found to be statistically significant at P < 0.05 were also included. 194 participants completed the survey with a mean age of 35.3 years. 73.2% were married, 16.5% were pregnant, 93% had one or more children and 81.5% were university educated. For the first five HLQ scales (score range 1-4), the lowest overall score was seen for the scale "Actively managing my health" (mean=2.96; SD=0.54). For the last four scales (score range 1-5), the lowest overall score was seen for the scale "Navigating the health care system" (mean=3.75, SD=0.67). Nonpregnant women, women with children, women with chronic health conditions and nonmarried women experienced more health literacy challenges. Women in our study showed various strengths and challenges with mean scores varying across the nine HLQ scales. Understanding the health literacy needs of women will enable health services to co-design solutions and interventions capable of responding to the evolving health needs of pregnant women and women with young children. This approach will ensure that codesigned solutions can engage the end-user in healthy lifestyle practices and the solutions are sustainable. SO WHAT?: We must shift away from a "one size fits all" approach to tailor services to respond to the differing health literacy needs of pregnant women and women with young children to support healthy lifestyle practices and reduce the NCD burden.

The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.

The aim of this study was to adapt the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in English and Norwegian for use with parents. The research group evaluated all HLQ items and, where relevant, modified them to refocus the attribution of care to that of a child by a parent. Five cognitive interviews with parents were undertaken to gain a detailed depiction of the meanings and processes they used to respond to the HLQ items. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the revised HLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 254 parents of children with epilepsy. Analysis included internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Some 22 out of 44 items and the names of three domains were modified (e.g. attribution changed from 'me' to 'my child'). Cognitive interviews indicated that parents interpreted the HLQ-Parent items in the way intended. All but three factor loadings were high to acceptable. All nine HLQ scales showed satisfactory to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.70 to 0.87). When fitting one-factor CFA models, correlated residuals were required for four scales to generate an acceptable fit. One scale, '8. Ability to find good health information', required inclusion of two correlated residuals to generate an acceptable CFA model fit, indicating that further work on this scale is warranted. The results from both the adaptation process and the CFA analysis supported the relevance, understanding and theoretical structure of the instrument in a parental context.

Health literacy dimensions as predictors of self-care agency among nursing students.

Self-care agency refers to the individuals' ability to recognize their needs to identify and perform self-care actions. However, the literature regarding the predictors of self-care agency among nursing students is limited. More specifically, the association between the dimensions of health literacy and self-care agency is lacking. This study was conducted to investigate whether nursing students' health literacy predicts self-care agency. A cross-sectional design was used. A total of 178 nursing students participated in this study. The participants completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire and the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised. Bivariate correlations and multiple linear regression (Enter method) analyses were performed. Bivariate correlations revealed that the nine Health Literacy Questionnaire scales had moderate, statistically significant correlations with self-care agency (Pearson's r=0.31 to 0.46, p<.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the model was statistically significant: F(9, 168)=8.19, p<.001. The adjusted R2 was 0.268, meaning that the model explained 26.8% of the outcome variance (self-care agency). The following scales (i.e., dimensions) of health literacy predicted more than a quarter of nursing students' self-care agency: "Actively managing my health," "Social support for health," "Navigating the healthcare system," and "Ability to find good health information".

Cultural and linguistic adaption and testing of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among healthy people in Korea

BackgroundsThis study administered the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among Korean adults to examine its factor structure, reliability, and validity.MethodsThe HLQ items were translated and culturally adapted to the Korean context. The convenience sampling method was used, and data were collected. The difficulty level, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using diagonal weighted least squares (DWLS) estimator in R, discriminant validity, and composite reliability were performed.ResultsThe easiest scale to obtain a high score was “Scale 4. Social support for health” and the hardest was “Scale 7. Navigating the healthcare system.” Nine one-factor models fitted well. The nine-factor structural equation model fitted the data well. All HLQ scales were homogenous, with composite reliability.ConclusionsThe Korean version of the HLQ has a strong construct and high composite reliability when applied to Korean adults.

Validation and measurement invariance of the Arabic Health Literacy Questionnaire

Health literacy plays a key role in empowering individuals and enabling them to make health-related decisions. Despite the advances in health literacy research, there are gaps in the literature that require further inquiry, and establishing comprehensive and valid measurements is one of them. Thus, this research was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), including the reliability, validity, and measurement invariances of the nine HLQ scales. A cross-sectional design was used in this study. A sample of university students (N = 1011) was recruited, the mean of age was 21.1 years old (SD = 2.28). The Arabic HLQ and a demographics questionnaire were completed by the participants. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and measurement invariances were performed for each HLQ scale. The values of Cronbach's α and composite reliability were above .70 for all HLQ scales. The CFA analyses showed that all HLQ scales meet the criteria that were set a priori: RMSEA ≤.07, CFI ≥.95, and Chisq/df < 5. In addition, all standardized factor loadings were above .50. Regarding the measurement invariance, the results supported the equal form measurement invariance for all HLQ scales. The equality of factor loadings measurement invariance across gender was also supported for all HLQ scales. Measurement invariance of factor loadings and equality of indicator intercepts was partially supported. These results show that the internal consistency, convergence, and factor structure of the HLQ are all supported. The Arabic HLQ is a reliable, valid tool to measure health literacy among Arabic-speaking populations.

Assessing health literacy among migrants and associated socioeconomic factors

Abstract   Health literacy, the ability to understand, access, appraise, remember and use health information and health services, has great potential to reduce health inequalities and improve access to and quality of health care, particularly among groups that experience vulnerability, including migrant groups. Across Europe, including in Portugal, little is known about the health literacy strengths, needs and preferences among migrants. We aimed to assess the health literacy of diverse migrants living in Portugal and identify if health literacy needs differ across sociodemographic subgroups. A cross-sectional survey was administered to migrants living in Portugal. Data were collected using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), an internationally tested and robust multi-dimensional measurement tool with nine scales, and a demographic and socioeconomic questionnaire. Associations were tested using Welch's ANOVA. In total, 1126 adult migrants were surveyed: 53.4% female, mean age of 35.8 years (range 18-77), 48.9% from African countries, 29.5% from Middle East/Asian countries, 21.6% from Brazil. Low scores on most HLQ scales were clearly associated with sociodemographic characteristics such as lower levels of education: 1. Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (p = 0.045); 2. Having sufficient information to manage health (p &amp;lt; 0.001); 3. Actively managing health (p = 0.036); 4. Social support for health (p = 0.001); 5. Appraisal of health information (p &amp;lt; 0.001); 7. Navigating the health system (p = 0.031); 8. Finding health information (p = 0.007). Similar patterns were found for participants who were unemployed and with lower income (&amp;lt;650€). Health literacy needs of migrant communities should be taken into account when designing interventions aiming to mitigate health inequalities and to promote health literacy. This is even more pertinent in the current context of the COVID-19, where its adverse social and economic impacts are likely to aggravate health inequalities. Key messages Lower health literacy is related to lower socioeconomic status. Mapping health literacy needs can inform interventions to mitigate health inequalities among vulnerable migrant groups.

Health literacy and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study in Burkina Faso

BackgroundHealth literacy refers to the skills and resources needed to find, understand and use information and services to maintain good health. Health-related quality of life refers to a person's perception of his or her health status, i.e., physical, social and mental well-being. The objective was to describe health literacy and analyze the relationships with quality of life and the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of people with type 2 diabetes in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. MethodsThis cross-sectional study involved 175 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from the specialized departments of 5 hospitals. Health literacy was assessed by the multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and quality of life by the EQ-5D-5 L (EuroQol, 5 dimensions and 5 levels). Standardized differences in means (effect size) were used to describe the magnitude of differences between subgroups. Results80.5% of patients in the sample were under 60 years of age. There were more women (70.3%) than men, 77.7% of patients had less than a high school education and 57.7% were employed. The most significant health literacy difficulties were found for the scales "Appraisal of health information" (mean = 2.57 [2.48 - 2.66]), "Navigating the health care system" (mean = 2.95 [2.84 - 3.06]), and “Ability to find good health information” (mean=2.96 [2.84 – 3.09]). In terms of quality of life, the "Pain/discomfort" dimension was the most impaired. Small to large standardized differences were observed for several HLQ scales according to gender, education level, employment status, family history status, length of time with diabetes and blood glucose level. There was a significant correlation between the HL and HRQoL scales (r from 0.31 to 0.49). ConclusionThis study objectively assessed the diversity of health literacy profiles on all scales of HLQ according to the socio-demographic status and specific characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes. Building on the diverse health literacy needs can be a strategy to help reduce inequalities and improve quality of life in type 2 diabetes.

Translating and validating the Health Literacy Questionnaire into Urdu: a robust nine-dimension confirmatory factor model.

Pakistani migrants are one of the fastest-growing communities in Australia, and the majority speak Urdu at home. There is a lack of information regarding the health literacy of this population. This study aimed to translate the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) into Urdu and to explore its psychometric properties. A structured standardized procedure was followed to translate and validate HLQ into Urdu. Data were collected from 202 Pakistani migrants residing in Australia. The HLQ-Urdu was well understood by the respondents. The structural properties of HLQ-Urdu were close to the original HLQ. Data for all HLQ scales met pre-specified criteria for fit in the one-factor CFA model. The composite reliability was high, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91. A strict nine-factor CFA model was also fitted to the data with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals allowed, which showed excellent model fit statistics [χ2WLSMV = 1266.022 (df = 866, p = 0.000), comparative fit index  = 0.995, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.994, root mean square error of approximation = 0.050 and standardized root mean square residual = 0.069]. The Urdu version of HLQ showed robust psychometric properties. This HLQ-Urdu tool is now ready to be used to assess health literacy in Pakistani migrants in Australia. Availability of health literacy tools in migrant languages may help healthcare providers better understand the health literacy needs of migrant communities.

The Health Literacy Questionnaire: Initial Validity Testing in a Norwegian Sample.

Background:The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a multidimensional generic questionnaire developed to capture a wide range of health literacy needs. There is a need for validation evidence for the Norwegian version of the HLQ (N-HLQ).Objective:The present study tested an initial version of the Norwegian HLQ by exploring its utility and construct validity among a group of nursing students.Methods:A pre-test survey was performed in participants (N = 18) who were asked to consider every item in the N-HLQ (44 items across nine scales). The N-HLQ was then administered to 368 respondents. Scale consistency was identified and extracted in a series of factor analyses (principal component analysis [PCA] with oblimin rotation) demanding a nine-dimension solution performed on randomly drawn 50% of the samples obtained by bootstrapping. Correlations between the nine factors obtained in the 13-factor PCA and the scale scores computed by the scale scoring syntaxes provided by the authors of the original HLQ were estimated.Key Results:The pre-test survey did not result in the need to rephrase items. The internal consistency of the nine HLQ scales was high, ranging from 0.81 to 0.72. The best fit for reproduction of the scales from the original HLQ was found for these dimensions: “1. feeling understood and supported by health care providers,” “2. having sufficient information to manage my health,” and “3. actively managing my health.” For the dimensions “7. navigating in the healthcare system” and “8. ability to find good health information,” a rather high degree of overlap was found, as indicated by relatively low differences between mean highest correlations and mean next-highest correlations.Conclusions:Despite some possible overlap between dimensions 7 and 8, the N-HLQ appeared relatively robust. Thus, this study's results contribute to the evidence validation base for the N-HLQ in Norwegian populations. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2020;4(4):e190–e199.]Plain Language Summary:This study tested the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire. The questionnaire (44 items across nine scales) was completed by 368 nursing students. Despite some overlap between scale 7 (“navigating in the health care system”) and scale 8 (“ability to find good health information”), the questionnaire appears to serve as a good measurement for health literacy in the Norwegian population.

The Association between Health Literacy and Self-Rated Health Amongst Australian University Students

Health literacy is the capacity to understand, access, and effectively utilize health information and healthcare to make informed health decisions. This cross-sectional study uses the multi-dimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) to investigate associations between demographic characteristics, self-rated health and health literacy among students (n = 932) in two Australian universities. We used Pearson’s chi-square to determine differences in self-rated health between demographic groups, Cohen’s defect Sizeto measure differences in HLQ scale scores between demographic groups, and logistic regression to determine associations between HLQ scores and self-rated health. A clear association was found between self-rated health and health literacy: as health literacy increased, so did self-rated health. Findings also demonstrate lower health literacy for culturally and linguistically diverse students, and those studying Arts compared to Health degrees. Lower self-rated health was correlated with HLQ scales including being less active in managing one’s own health, having less social support for one’s health, possessing insufficient health information and lower confidence in navigating the healthcare system. This study provides a comprehensive picture of potentially vulnerable students and identifies strategies for supporting their health endeavors while studying at university.

Associations between disease education, self-management support, and health literacy in psoriasis

Background Patients’ ability to perform self-management may be compromised if they are unable to fully comprehend their diagnosis and treatments. Weaknesses in health literacy (HL) pose a considerable health concern and may negatively influence SM, as well as interactions with health care professionals (HCP) and peers. Objectives To investigate possible associations between comprehensive HL and psoriasis education from HCPs in a cohort of patients with psoriasis. Another aim was to examine essential sources for psoriasis information and how these are evaluated. Methods Cross-sectional questionnaire data, including the comprehensive Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) from 825 patients with psoriasis who had participated in Climate Helio Therapy (CHT). Results Participants having received HCP education scored significantly better in all HLQ scales compared to participants who did not receive such education (Cohen’s effect size: 0.24 to 0.44). The CHT program, peers, and dermatologists were the most important sources of psoriasis information. People having participated more than once in CHT presented better HL scores and also higher self-management (skill and technique acquisition) and more psoriasis knowledge (effect-size: 0.75). Conclusions Psoriasis education by HCP seems important for HL and psoriasis knowledge. Patients may need multiple approaches and repetitions over time to be health literate and effective self-managers.

Health literacy: exploring disparities among college students

BackgroundHealth literacy is a multidimensional concept that is considered a primary public health concern. This concept is often neglected in research, and the evidence regarding health literacy in college students is limited. The aim of this study was two-fold: to determine the needs and limitations of health literacy among college students and to explore the relationships among the nine dimensions of health literacy and sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, nationality, year of study, field of study, smoking status, history of chronic diseases, use of on-campus gym, and the intention to exercise on-campus.MethodsThis study was conducted using a cross-sectional approach. A total of 520 college students participated in this study. The average age was 21.03 years (SD = 2.29), with 47.5% males and 52.5% females. Data were collected using a demographics questionnaire and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). In addition to descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and follow-up analyses were performed to explore any statistically significant mean differences among levels of health literacy and sociodemographic factors.ResultsThe levels of health literacy on the nine HLQ scales were lower than the levels reported in the literature. Multivariate analysis showed a significant effect of age, gender, smoking status, year of study, and field of study on the level of health literacy. Follow-up analyses revealed that female students, students from the health-related faculties, and those who do not smoke have higher levels of health literacy compared to their counterparts. A detailed comparison between the levels of the HLQ scales was made based on students’ demographic characteristics. The field of study had the most prominent effect on the level of college students’ health literacy; mean differences were statistically significant (p < .001), and effect sizes were large (ranging from .66 to 1.35 for the nine scales of the HLQ).ConclusionCollege students’ health literacy is influenced by demographic characteristics. Such variations could amplify some of the existing health disparities. The implications of the findings on health, health promotion, and interprofessional education are discussed.

Adding value to remote monitoring: Co-design of a health literacy intervention for older people with chronic disease delivered by telehealth - The telehealth literacy project

ObjectiveTo co-design, test and evaluate a health literacy, chronic disease self-management and social support intervention for older people delivered by group videoconferencing into the home. MethodThe Telehealth Literacy Project (THLP) was a mixed methods, quasi-experimental, non-randomised trial nested within a telehealth remote monitoring study. An intervention group (n = 52) participated in five, weekly videoconference group meetings lasting for 1.5 h and a control group (n = 60) received remote monitoring only. Outcomes were measured using the nine-scale Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and two scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). Semi-structured interviews and focus group data were thematically analysed. ResultAt 3 month follow-up, univariate analysis identified small effects in the intervention group only, with improved health literacy behaviours (five HLQ scales) and self-management skills (two heiQ scales). ANOVA of HLQ scales indicated no significant differences between the two groups over time indicating a contributing effect of the remote monitoring project. Intervention participants reported improved perception of companionship, emotional and informational support. ConclusionThe THLP delivered with telemonitoring indicates potential to improve social support and some health literacy factors in older people. Practice implicationsPatient education can be delivered by group videoconferencing.

The health literacy questionnaire among the aged in Changsha, China: confirmatory factor analysis

BackgroundHealth literacy is defined as the cognitive and social skills that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. A Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a toolkit with good reliability and validity. Accordingly, this study administered HLQ among older adults in China to examine its factor structure, reliability, homogeneity, and discriminant validity for use in understanding better the health literacy of older adults and determining corresponding measures.MethodsPsychometric properties were examined based on the data collected via face-to-face interviews (N = 343). Tests included the difficulty level, composite scale reliability, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM).ResultsThe easiest scale to obtain a high score was “Social support for health” and the hardest, “Navigating the health care system” and “Appraisal of health information.” Two one-factor models fitted well with no correlated residuals allowed. After model modification, the CFA fit statistics of the other seven scales were good. All HLQ scales were found to be homogenous, with a composite reliability ranging from 0.74 to 0.85. The nine-factor Bayesian structural equation model fitted the data well (Posterior-Predictive-P value = 0.670; 95% Confidence Interval for the difference between the observed and replicated Chi-square values = − 163.320, 102.750).ConclusionsThe Chinese version of the HLQ has strong construct and content validity and high composite reliability when applied to older adults in Changsha City, China. Therefore, the nine-scale HLQ can now be administered to Chinese older adults, thereby providing a powerful approach to understanding the multidimensional area of health literacy.

Health literacy profile of recently hospitalised patients in the private hospital setting: a cross sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)

BackgroundHealth service providers should understand and attend to the health literacy needs of their population in view of the known association between low health literacy and poorer health outcomes. This study aimed to determine the health literacy profile of patients treated at a large private hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and any associations between this profile and socio-economic position, health behaviours, health status and use of hospital services.MethodsA mailed survey was sent to 9173 people aged ≥18 years with a hospital admission between February and October 2014. It included the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), a multidimensional tool comprising nine independent scales, and socio-demographic and clinical questions. For both respondents and non-respondents, we also extracted residential postcode and admission and follow up details from the Patient Administrative Services database. Differences in demographic, socio-economic and hospital use patterns between respondents and non-respondents were analysed using descriptive statistics. Regression-tests were used to identify differences in health literacy between socio-economic subgroups, with the magnitude of these differences determined using Cohen’s d effect sizes.ResultsThere were 3121 respondents (response rate: 35% excluding 154 returned invitations), the majority born in Australia (74.6%) and living in areas of high socio-economic advantage. Respondents were slightly older than non-respondents (mean (SD) age 65.6 (17.0) versus 60.6 (20.8) years) and included proportionately less females (51.9 versus 59.1%) but were similar with regard to other socio-demographic factors and health service use. Participants who did not speak English at home, reported lower scores across several HLQ scales, including those that measure health provider support and engagement. Those who smoked and reported low physical activity had lower scores for actively managing their health. No relationship was seen between HLQ scale scores and use of hospital services.ConclusionsBased upon the health literacy profile of a large cohort of patients attending a large private hospital, we found no relationship between HLQ scale scores and use of hospital services. However we did identify significant health literacy needs particularly among patients whose primary language at home was not English and patients needing assistance completing the survey. Identifying ways of addressing these needs may improve patient outcomes.

Health literacy in a population-based sample of Australian women: a cross-sectional profile of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study

BackgroundThe term health literacy refers to the abilities and resources required to find, understand and use health information in managing health. This definition is reflected in the recent development of multidimensional health literacy tools that measure multiple facets of health literacy. The aim of this study was to determine the health literacy profile of a randomly selected, population-based sample of Australian women using a multidimensional tool, the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). A second aim was to investigate associations between independent HLQ scales, sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle and anthropometric risk factors for chronic disease.MethodsWe surveyed women involved in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS), a longitudinal, population-based study. We included demographic data, lifestyle information and anthropometric measures as well as the HLQ. The HLQ has 44 items, scored on either 4- or 5-point scales, within nine conceptually distinct scales. Means for each scale were calculated, and HLQ scales were regressed on educational level and socioeconomic status. Risk factors for chronic disease were investigated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and calculation of effect sizes.ResultsHigher mean scores were seen for the scales ‘Feeling understood and supported by healthcare professionals’ (mean 3.20, ± SD 0.52) and ‘Understanding health information well enough to know what to do’ (mean 4.28, ±SD 0.54), and lower mean scores were seen for ‘Appraisal of health information’ (mean 2.81, ±SD 0.48) and ‘Navigating the healthcare system’ (mean 4.09, ± SD 0.57). Associations were also seen between lower HLQ scores and poor health behaviours including smoking and being more sedentary, in addition to greater body mass index and waist circumference. Positive gradients were seen between several HLQ scales and education level, as well as SES. For some HLQ scales, these associations were non-linear.ConclusionsThe profile of this population-based cohort of women demonstrated associations between low health literacy and low SES, lower levels of education, increasing age, and anthropometric and lifestyle risk factors for chronic disease. These findings suggest implications of health literacy for health policy makers focusing on improving lifestyle prevention of chronic disease and promoting health equity at a population level.